Chapter 6 · Section 5 practice
ARCH, GARCH and Conditional Risk
These questions review the examples in the companion slides. Choose an answer, then check the explanation.
Question 1
For daily Dow Jones returns, which is more predictable from yesterday?
- The sign (up or down)
- The size (how big the move is)
- Both equally
- Neither — returns are i.i.d.
Question 2
Which pattern will acf(r) and acf(r**2) show at lags 1–5?
- Both inside the ±0.052 band — returns are white noise, so are their squares
- Both far outside the band — returns are strongly autocorrelated
- \(r_t\) mostly inside the band; \(r_t^2\) far outside at every lag
- \(r_t\) far outside; \(r_t^2\) inside
Question 3
Compared with ARCH(\(q\)), the \(\beta\) term makes the ACF of \(\varepsilon_t^2\)…
- Cut off sharply after lag 1
- Decay geometrically at rate \(\alpha+\beta\), never cutting off — GARCH(1,1) is ARCH(\(\infty\))
- Zero at every lag
- Constant at every lag
Question 4
Engle’s ARCH-LM test for order \(q\) regresses:
- \(r_t\) on \(r_{t-1},\dots,r_{t-q}\) and reports the F-test
- \(|r_t|\) on time and reports the slope
- \(\hat\varepsilon_t^2\) on \(\hat\varepsilon_{t-1}^2,\dots,\hat\varepsilon_{t-q}^2\) and reports \(LM = nR^2 \sim \chi^2_q\)
- \(\hat\varepsilon_t\) on \(\hat\varepsilon_t^2\) and reports \(R^2\)
Question 5
\(\hat\alpha = 0.1000\) and \(\hat\beta = 0.8800\) to four decimals. What is the most likely explanation?
- The Dow really has \(\alpha=0.10\), \(\beta=0.88\) exactly
archrounds to two decimals- These are the optimiser’s starting values — it never moved because the data were in decimals
- Only 1 260 observations, so the estimate is coarse
Question 6
Over 2019–2020 the 1 % VaR should be breached about 5 times (473 × 0.01). Which is closer to 5?
- Unconditional VaR — a fixed number is more robust
- Both hit exactly 5
- GARCH — it re-scales within days; unconditional VaR is breached far more, mostly in March 2020
- Neither breaches at all